« Casual Fridays | Main | Nuclear Mondays »

01 February 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b39369e20128773c07e2970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Trijicon's Rifle Scopes:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

"Why did they pick the most expensive one", you ask?

Simple. They are playing with Other People's Money (ours). Which is pretty much why everything that the DoD buys costs far too much.

Up until pretty recently there hasn't been an alternative to the Trijicon ACOG scope, and there still isn't one that is significantly less expensive. Leupold, Aimpoint and Eotech(now owned by L3) are really the only viable reflex sight manufacturers other than Trijcon because they're the only games in town that have consistently made durable sights. All of these manfuacturers sell sights which are between 500-1000 dollars. Brownells and burris sights, like all low profile refelx sights are good for plinkers but will break rather easily when dropped.

Marines bought the Trjicon ACOG because they are the best in magnified reflex sights.

Daskro's right, no good alternative, you train a Marine with Iron Sites, everyone's a rifleman, ACOG's are the best and you don't put cheap shit in the hands of our marines and troopers. Plus you buy a lot cause it's a good piece of gear and it ain't marine or sailor proof. It's like my mother in law, when she finds shoes she likes that fit well and are comfortable, you buy a pair in every color they have...simple common sense.

Also the ACOG is fully passive with no battery requirement, and has 4x magnification vs the typical 1x magnification on the EOTEC and Aimpoint sights.

also the retail price on that optic is $1500.... so you might want to re-check that... http://www.amazon.com/s/?ie=UTF8&keywords=ta31rco&tag=googhydr-20&index=aps&hvadid=1696007801&ref=pd_sl_60wl8i8uks_b

Search ACOG cheaper, this is a great purchase. The optics are great and there is a red / green illumintated (cross full) term. This was something I had not expected and is a nice additional feature. Over all seems well built and the houseing around the optical, is very strong.

The comments to this entry are closed.

May 2011

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

Daily Thoughts


What I'm Reading

Countering WMDs

National Security

General Military Links

National Security Thinktanks

My Photo

Sigger's Law

  • Sigger's Law: "As any discussion on terrorism grows longer, the probability of attributing terrorists with nuclear weapons (or similar destructive capabilities) approaches 1." Corollary to Sigger's Law: "Once such an observation is made, the discussion is finished and whoever mentioned terrorist possession of nuclear weapons has automatically lost whatever debate was in progress."

CBRND Wiki Project

  • CBRND/CWMD in the Wikipedia
    This post is dedicated as a reference site for Wikipedia entries relating to CBRN defense or WMD issues. Some of them badly need improvements and/or references.

Google Search

  • Google

    WWW
    armchairgeneralist.typepad.com

Armed Forces Press Service

Political and Social Commentary Blogs

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Blog Directories

Notable

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 12/2004