« John Yoo Breaks the Asshat Scale | Main | It Always Leads to This »

25 February 2010

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b39369e201310f35a65e970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference I'm Afraid of Americans:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

It looks like a fiberglass and lexan version of any building in Hong Kong with the perpetual façade of bamboo scaffolding that encircles every building there in a regular rotation for rebuilding, painting, and what not.

Yippie for the always under construction look.

All your embassies are assimilated...

Resistance is futile! Lol.

Anyway - I paid more attention to the sheer size than to the "unfriendly" aspect. It's a huge thing and I seriously doubt that this size is really necessary.

Sven: you know, I thought about that, too. Granted, London is a huge tourist/student/business destination for Americans and probably has an unusually large consular staff. But there is also a lot of intelligence-sharing and joint collection initiatives (especially in signals intelligence) and I wonder how much of that staff will be based in this building.

The British Government has been an unequivocal enthusiast for the Global Surveillance State and never says "no" to the FBI/CIA/DEA/Revenooers when they want to sneak and peek into the terabytes of data that flow through the City. An ominous Borg Cube may be more appropriate than the British public imagines.

Well, I'll miss the old building with the Eagle and its long attention span, and the Naval Intelligence building across the way. Deceptively homely; smiles all round with definite ulterior motives.
This one will not pretend, or be as inviting, but glint malevolently in the London sunshine, and glower when it rains. Still, it might have a decent bar.

Uh, James; that last paragraph of yours. This might be somewhat modified over the recent Falklands issues.

Ray, what do you mean? Are you referring to the fact that the citizens of the Falklands are having their right to self determination disrespected by Argentina?
"global ambitions will cause consequences from people who object to those policies."
Seems like an accurate assessment. Any country can have "global ambitions".
Argentina seems to have ambitions toward the Falklands, the Islanders have voted in a referenda and decided to stay a British territory.
Brits are very aware that "global ambitions" have repercussions, which is why there is no Empire anymore only a Commonwealth.

Hello, Scathsealgaire. Yes, I am saying that Argentina that "the citizens of the Falklands are having their right to self determination disrespected by Argentina"
They make little or no reference to that in their claims.
The islanders do not want to be Argentinian citizens. Forget the past; it's the present that has relevance. No historical "facts" have relevance to a person wishing to keep their long-established homes intact.

Thanks for clarifying that Ray.

PS: I have been to the Falklands; albeit a long time ago. I was tending the air- pumps for a Royal Navy deep-sea diver, in Port Stanley Harbour, gathering seafloor samples; possibly for oil-shale, but we weren't told. Could have been updating the Admiralty charts, for all I know. A porpoise was trying to push the diver off his feet, but I don't think that the, very large, animal was from Argentina. This didn't stop the swearing from the diver who was muttering "F---off!" which came to us through the tinny sounding telephone in the boat.
Also, I with others from our ship, enjoyed the hospitality of the islanders, via a few pints in a tiny cabin, which was a long walking distance through flocks of sheep, and across the boggy "moors". In that makeshift pub we were served in the "bar" through a tiny hatch with a sliding cover in the timber wall.
The nearest I got to Argentina was when we passed from the Pacific side and through the Magellan Straits, and anchored near Punta Arenas.
I like tango music, too.

The comments to this entry are closed.

May 2011

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

Daily Thoughts


What I'm Reading

Countering WMDs

National Security

General Military Links

National Security Thinktanks

My Photo

Sigger's Law

  • Sigger's Law: "As any discussion on terrorism grows longer, the probability of attributing terrorists with nuclear weapons (or similar destructive capabilities) approaches 1." Corollary to Sigger's Law: "Once such an observation is made, the discussion is finished and whoever mentioned terrorist possession of nuclear weapons has automatically lost whatever debate was in progress."

CBRND Wiki Project

  • CBRND/CWMD in the Wikipedia
    This post is dedicated as a reference site for Wikipedia entries relating to CBRN defense or WMD issues. Some of them badly need improvements and/or references.

Google Search

  • Google

    WWW
    armchairgeneralist.typepad.com

Armed Forces Press Service

Political and Social Commentary Blogs

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Blog Directories

Notable

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 12/2004