
Israel and the United States are participating in a missile defense exercise called "Juniper Cobra," a biennial exercise between the two nations.
The Haaretz newspaper describes it as "a preparation for a faceoff with Iran." That's really nice, because we really needed another reason to confirm Muslim suspicions that the US government is solidly in bed with Israel and working against Iran.
This year, the Ohio CBRN Enhanced Response Force (CERF) has nine of its members joining the exercise to see how the Israeli Home Front Command does its job.
The Ohioans have been observing and participating in training with the Israeli Home Front Command (HFC) Search and Rescue School, Unit Training Branch. The HFC is similar to the National Guard in structure and mission. It is comprised mainly of reservists and serves the people of Israel through disaster relief, nuclear, biological and chemical (NBC) operations, search and rescue, and supporting the Israeli Defense Force, which conducts all combat operations.
Only three other state National Guards have done any type of exchange or training with the Israelis, the majority of which have been conducted in the U.S.
“Any exchange is important,” Meislin said. “The CERF is very important to the HFC because they are exact counterparts. They are just really into saving lives no matter where it is, and so are we, so it’s a good fit.”
There's no question that the Israeli HFC has to be on its toes in this area, but then again, their nation is surrounded by countries with nasty munitions. Its chem-bio military compatriots in the IDF have a saying, "If they're using us, everyone else is either hiding, underground, or already dead." I have no issues with the training, but it's not exactly an "exact counterpart." The alleged domestic terrorist CBRN threat to the United States isn't close to what Israel has from external national WMD threats. But I suppose the Ohio CERF was bored from the lack of action here in the States and wanted some travel time.
Right now, we have the DOD trying to reform its former concept for three CCMRFs into 10 smaller units, not because they can identify the threat any better but it's "more efficient." It's still just as wasteful, lacking a real reason for being. We really lack a coherent strategy that describes what DOD is trying to do with consequence management, either in the domestic environment or in support of other nations (foreign CM). Part of the problem is that the US government doesn't really know what it wants, other than to respond with massive resources if/when the incident happens. But the threat assessment is overblown, the mass casualty incident isn't going to happen tomorrow, the resources are being wasted, and all the defense officials pretend that it's more important than what the situation really portends.
I don't think our current administration is any smarter about "countering WMD" than the last, in some respects. That's unfortunate, I actually had the notion that they might improve the academic discussion on this area. As a side note, I noticed Israeli press and other web sites referring to WMDs as "nonconventional warfare." That's not the same as unconventional warfare, which refers to special forces operations and guerilla warfare. But I know we used to refer to NBC weapons as "unconventional weapons" as opposed to conventional weapons - so do we now have unconventional warfare and nonconventional weapons for irregular warfare, and nonconventional warfare and unconventional weapons for nuclear warfare?
We're so confused.
Recent Comments