« Speaking of Pueblo Chemical Depot | Main | The Title Explains Itself »

21 September 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b39369e20120a5dc3f06970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Please, Just Leave the Army:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

CPT Rhodes' letter reeks of BS and fear. Maybe she didn't authorize the motion for reconsideration, but she was most certainly on board with the original lawsuit -- a lawsuit which was based on nothing more than frivolous assertions of paranoid fantasy. CPT Rhodes either:

a) feels entitled to challenge orders in federal court because she doesn't like how the election turned out, or

b) is willing to use any available method to try to avoid a deployment she doesn't like.

Either way, you judged her right the first time.

The birthers, the tea baggers, the screamers, and the deathers continued extreme minority presence will become tiresome to mainstream America, if it has not already done so. To all the birthers in La, La Land, it is on you to prove to all of us that your assertion is true, if there are people who were there and support your position then show us the video (everyone has a price), either put up or frankly shut-up. I heard Orly Taitz, is selling a tape (I think it’s called “Money, Lies and Video tape”). She is from Orange County, CA, now I know what the mean when they say “behind the Orange Curtain”, when they talk about Orange County, the captial of Conspiracy Theories. You know Obama has a passport, he travel abroad before he was a Senator, but I guess they were in on it. In my opinion the Republican Party has been taken over the most extreme religious right (people who love to push their beliefs on others while trying to take away the rights of those they just hate) and that’s who they need to extract from their party if they real want to win. Good Luck, because as they said in WACO, “We Ain’t Coming Out”. I heard that she now wants to investigate the “Republican 2009 Summer of Love” list: Assemblyman, Michael D. Duvall (CA), Senator John Ensign (NV), Senator Paul Stanley (TN), Governor Mark Stanford (SC), Board of Ed Chair, and Kristin Maguire AKA Bridget Keeney (SC).

I wouldn't let this captain off the hook. She's obviously unhinged and unfit for duty. How many active duty officers seek legal counsel to determine if a deployment order is legal?

You called it right the first time.

There is a very positive side to this. Just thank your lucky stars you have a brand of democracy that allows this sort of thing to be aired.
What does it matter, really. Nobody thinks that the US Army will suffer unduly because of one tiny hiccup in the system. It is just one of those things that add to the colourful tapestry of life. How many of you have watched "M.A.S.H" ?
This was just the thing for an episode.

Of course, you're right, Ray. I might expect that anyone joining the Army should understand things like the roles and responsibilities of its commander-in-chief, but there are always the fringe elements. The Army will not dwell on this blip on its reputation. Just a half-hour episode in the ongoing series.

Make sure it was a lawful order? Hmmm. She just needs to check out the infamous "N" designation which is at the top of the orders. At least that is the way we determine a "lawful order" in the Navy.

Then, she can check all the "from", "to" and "via" in the subject line.

Naturally look for words and phrases like "Report", "PERSUPPDET", "Quarters are Available" and "Use of Government Mess Facilities."

Maybe Capt. Rhodes was looking for the set of orders that said she was on a mob platform to Hawaii, staying in a penthouse suite and receiving a huge daily per diem?

Tammy

[PVT] Judy Benjamin: I think they sent me to the wrong place.
Capt. Lewis: Uh-huh.
Judy Benjamin: See, I did join the army, but I joined a *different* army. I joined the one with the condos and the private rooms.

It's 2009. Everyone wearing the uniform today either enlisted or reenlisted since 2001 and so I find it hard to imagine anyone could claim they're surprised by a deployment order to Iraq/Afghanistan, OR question its lawfulness.

Just goofy. I can't imagine this incident will reflect well on her next OER.

We are all adults here, and as adults we know there are consequences for are actions, so if you do not agree with his policies, you can a) do nothing, b) support him, c) not support him, d) protest and picket, its your choice, live the dream! As for Orly Taitz, to this point she has not been successful because she does not have any proof, documentation supporting her claims except her wild rants. I would not bet the farm on this one. She has a mail-order-degree get someone with real credentials (Harvard, Yale Law School) not a Russian immigrant with dual US/ Israel citizenship (where are her allegiances?). Have you even thought of who is paying for all her travel, or are you telling me she independently wealthy? Sorry she has no juice because she does not have any proof, documentation supporting her claims except her wild rants. That might work in “Fake News” but not in a Court of the United States.

She took the oath. That is the bottom line. Early on co-workers asked me what I thought of entrance into Iraq. Doesn't matter. The oath is an apolitical act. I have guarded this oath under three presidents now. The oath is what binds to duty, not the administration in office.

Tammy

To all the Birthers. Where is the beef "Proof that is"? or "Got Proof" But of course you have as much proof as you do common sense, none. Live the dream!

The comments to this entry are closed.

May 2011

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

Daily Thoughts


What I'm Reading

Countering WMDs

National Security

General Military Links

National Security Thinktanks

My Photo

Sigger's Law

  • Sigger's Law: "As any discussion on terrorism grows longer, the probability of attributing terrorists with nuclear weapons (or similar destructive capabilities) approaches 1." Corollary to Sigger's Law: "Once such an observation is made, the discussion is finished and whoever mentioned terrorist possession of nuclear weapons has automatically lost whatever debate was in progress."

CBRND Wiki Project

  • CBRND/CWMD in the Wikipedia
    This post is dedicated as a reference site for Wikipedia entries relating to CBRN defense or WMD issues. Some of them badly need improvements and/or references.

Google Search

  • Google

    WWW
    armchairgeneralist.typepad.com

Armed Forces Press Service

Political and Social Commentary Blogs

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Blog Directories

Notable

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 12/2004