« OMB Says Cut Government Contractors | Main | Crap Beer at White House »

31 July 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b39369e20115714a365e970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Book Reviews:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

It's widespread; collective actions from intelligence, as these books show, that is ready for acting upon but going with the bullshit instead. There should be a basic, no nonsense written principle, compulsory, in training; there isn't one. Just a plethora of words surrounding a kernel (which can shift, admittedly) that everyone seems to ignore.
Possession of important information is often regarded as a sufficient end in itself. Unbelievable, when you see that some people are so talented in the business.
Information without constant cyclic- review for action is utterly useless. Increases the work load, but that's too bad. Piles of words need sifting and discarding.

I'm sorry guys if this all seems cloudy, and pontificating, but there is that intelligence without action and it kills people. e.g. 9/11

Ker-ching. Cheers.
I was suspicious it might be some research paper i could get off the net reformatted into paperback.

BTW isn't it great to finally get through the chapter "How to create an insurgency" in Fiasco and then be met with "How to create an insurgency Part 2".

Ray - yes, agree with your philosophy exactly. I think the Japanese have a saying that there are three powers - money, weapons, and intelligence. Seems like we utilize only two out of three (and even then, not really that well). I like to think that I make my living out of "sifting and discarding" the right words to make analyses. Challenge is finding any leaders who are willing to act upon them.

I'd just like to lower the standard of discussion by noting that Gretchen Peters looked teh hoyt on the Daily Show.

The comments to this entry are closed.

May 2011

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

Daily Thoughts


What I'm Reading

Countering WMDs

National Security

General Military Links

National Security Thinktanks

My Photo

Sigger's Law

  • Sigger's Law: "As any discussion on terrorism grows longer, the probability of attributing terrorists with nuclear weapons (or similar destructive capabilities) approaches 1." Corollary to Sigger's Law: "Once such an observation is made, the discussion is finished and whoever mentioned terrorist possession of nuclear weapons has automatically lost whatever debate was in progress."

CBRND Wiki Project

  • CBRND/CWMD in the Wikipedia
    This post is dedicated as a reference site for Wikipedia entries relating to CBRN defense or WMD issues. Some of them badly need improvements and/or references.

Google Search

  • Google

    WWW
    armchairgeneralist.typepad.com

Armed Forces Press Service

Political and Social Commentary Blogs

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Blog Directories

Notable

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 12/2004