« New US Commander for Afghanistan | Main | Teh Stupidz! It Burnz Us! »

13 May 2009

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b39369e201157082e7e5970b

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Hey, Our Bad:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

He recanted once back into CIA custody....because all we did was waterboard him.

See J. two things, one 10 out of 10 times that guy wanted out of Egypt to GITMO so bad, he'd pick waterboarding over being buried alive and the dozen other things they do in Egyptian prisons. And don't rise above all this torture stuff, we've picked a couple of bad things, we're doing them because we needed to, not anymore anyway, and we're done, so we played the game. Now release the other two memos and vindicate the methods for that timeframe and be done with it.
Two, Cheney is NOT abandoning his men in the field like former administrations have done. He doesn't care about policy changes, he just acts like he does to get the air time so he can say that he is particularly pissed that Obama and his self righteous punk asses are going after the very people that crafted this policy, which is now changed. Release the memos, be done with it, stop witch hunting. The American public does not need to hold accountable public servants who were doing their duty at the time as best they could to protect this country, and if you hang them, then hang the DEMS on the intel committee who sat back and watched it happen saying they couldn't do anything...come on, gotta respect Darth for not leaving his men behind...

I'm not for initial prosecutions being used against those who did the techniques. I'm for those who never sullied their puffy asses in the field for one night and crafted all sorts of imaginary scenarios wherein torture was the only choice, to be tried first.

The architects of these policies are truly despicable.

As for the effectiveness angle, would a torture supporter please tell me if they believe all of the people who admitted to being witches and having danced with the devil by the pale moonlight actually were witches?

Ok, but at the witch trials intellectual authority on deduced from books and other intellectuals as truth, just a couple generations later, you had guys saying wait and minute, prove they are witches and show me how they do those things you accuse them of. Thus we arrive to present day to find the reverse happening, the "withches" admit to doing what they, that being bombings, flying planes into buildings, etc and now they have the power to resist common questioning techniques that maybe weren't so present back in the 1600s. So we add a couple face slaps and for the really bad guys ( I guess there were three for sure ) we poor water over their face wrapped in saran wrap to loosen them up a bit. No doubt, some went to far, got screwed, but they deserved it because they took pictures of it. So while torture does NOT provide proven factual intelligence, Harsh interrogation techniques serve a purpose when administered correctly under controlled conditions. And in the ticking time bomb scenario, just rip the lamp cord out of the wall and attach to testicles, who knows, you'll probably get a lead out of it anyway...Jack Bauer always seems to...

The comments to this entry are closed.

May 2011

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

Daily Thoughts


What I'm Reading

Countering WMDs

National Security

General Military Links

National Security Thinktanks

My Photo

Sigger's Law

  • Sigger's Law: "As any discussion on terrorism grows longer, the probability of attributing terrorists with nuclear weapons (or similar destructive capabilities) approaches 1." Corollary to Sigger's Law: "Once such an observation is made, the discussion is finished and whoever mentioned terrorist possession of nuclear weapons has automatically lost whatever debate was in progress."

CBRND Wiki Project

  • CBRND/CWMD in the Wikipedia
    This post is dedicated as a reference site for Wikipedia entries relating to CBRN defense or WMD issues. Some of them badly need improvements and/or references.

Google Search

  • Google

    WWW
    armchairgeneralist.typepad.com

Armed Forces Press Service

Political and Social Commentary Blogs

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Blog Directories

Notable

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 12/2004