« Bad Bugs or Bad Reporting? | Main | Cold Warriors »

09 October 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b39369e200e54ef3ecc38833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference This Was Only A Test:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

This is so cool, no posturing, no claims, demands, denials and counter claims. Just the hand of Yahweh comes down and wipes a Syrian weapons depot out. Then? Nobody says shit. Israelis keep it on the down low and the Syrians don't bitch cause they don't know where the next punch might land. Much better way of handling such "unpleasantness" than last summers very public and embarrasing adventure in S. Lebanon.

Holy shit, GJ, we agree.

I can't remember what I was reading, but I'm pretty positive you wouldn't have agreed with its politics, but it basically was saying how Israel just came in, DEEP, past all these 200 air defenses that the Syrians bought from the Russians, and took out whatever it was, me I'm leaning towards chem stuff, but only b/c of the Jane's Defence article a while back about the explosion ( which I still am skeptical about too ). But yes, Jesus Saves, Passes to Moses, Shoots, Scores....we should do this more often.

Of COURSE Israel had no problem waltzing in and doing whatever they felt like. They've got the best military weapons and intel my taxes can buy!

(obligatory disclaimer - if you think knocking on Israel is anti-semitic then you read the New York Times too often. It's a country and should be dealt with as such. My sometime dislike of the UK doesn't make me anti-muslim either, just for the record.)

The comments to this entry are closed.

May 2011

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

Daily Thoughts


What I'm Reading

Countering WMDs

National Security

General Military Links

National Security Thinktanks

My Photo

Sigger's Law

  • Sigger's Law: "As any discussion on terrorism grows longer, the probability of attributing terrorists with nuclear weapons (or similar destructive capabilities) approaches 1." Corollary to Sigger's Law: "Once such an observation is made, the discussion is finished and whoever mentioned terrorist possession of nuclear weapons has automatically lost whatever debate was in progress."

CBRND Wiki Project

  • CBRND/CWMD in the Wikipedia
    This post is dedicated as a reference site for Wikipedia entries relating to CBRN defense or WMD issues. Some of them badly need improvements and/or references.

Google Search

  • Google

    WWW
    armchairgeneralist.typepad.com

Armed Forces Press Service

Political and Social Commentary Blogs

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Blog Directories

Notable

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 12/2004