« Intel Ironies | Main | Dirty Pool »

09 January 2007

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451b39369e200d8342d738153ef

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Why Somalia?:

» Somalia: what was happening last year about this time? from MountainRunner
With all the happening in the Horn right now, I thought I'd revisit some of my posts from last year this time on Somalia and the Horn. It won't fully answer the question Why Somalia? but it will shed some... [Read More]

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

The "transitional government" in Somalia is always breathlessly described as "UN-recognized," and I'm sure it is, but that doesn't change the fact that it is basically self-appointed. A bunch of warlords got together in Kenya and handed out titles to each other in hopes of getting international recognition and, of course, aid. It worked like gangbusters, only one problem: no one in Somalia takes them seriously. But these days, governments are made legitimate by foreign recognition, not domestic support. See Iraq, for example.

Ethiopia is in violation of a UN-brokered peace treaty with Eritrea, which is something else that isn't often reported. A UN commission drew a new border after hearing both sides of the dispute, which Ethipoia promptly disregarded, touching off the last couple of rounds of fighting between the two countries. Realpolitik puts us in Ethiopia's camp, fine, but let's cut the pretense of righteousness, shall we?

Little Eritrea has been bullied constantly since it won its independence from Ethiopia right about the time the Baltic States got free of the Soviet Union. It's forced to spend most of its money on its military to stave off the Ethiopians, who have no real intention of letting Eritrea go: Eritrea, you see, was their only coastal province.

The comments to this entry are closed.

May 2011

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30 31        

Daily Thoughts


What I'm Reading

Countering WMDs

National Security

General Military Links

National Security Thinktanks

My Photo

Sigger's Law

  • Sigger's Law: "As any discussion on terrorism grows longer, the probability of attributing terrorists with nuclear weapons (or similar destructive capabilities) approaches 1." Corollary to Sigger's Law: "Once such an observation is made, the discussion is finished and whoever mentioned terrorist possession of nuclear weapons has automatically lost whatever debate was in progress."

CBRND Wiki Project

  • CBRND/CWMD in the Wikipedia
    This post is dedicated as a reference site for Wikipedia entries relating to CBRN defense or WMD issues. Some of them badly need improvements and/or references.

Google Search

  • Google

    WWW
    armchairgeneralist.typepad.com

Armed Forces Press Service

Political and Social Commentary Blogs

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Blog Directories

Notable

Blog powered by TypePad
Member since 12/2004